A recent secret meeting among ministers of Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF) to relieve Dias Toffoli from overseeing the Banco Master case has generated various interpretations and doubts among experts, highlighting concerns over the transparency of such decisions. The move appears contradictory to constitutional principles that advocate for openness in judicial proceedings. Some legal analysts question whether Toffoli has simply 'disengaged' from the case or if he will still participate in its voting, demonstrating the ambiguity surrounding the decision.

Opinions among specialists are divided regarding the appropriateness of holding a private meeting to discuss the issue. Some argue that it deviates from established protocols, which typically favor public procedures in judicial matters, while others suggest that the context may warrant the secrecy involved due to the sensitivities of the case. The Folha newspaper sought clarification from the STF on whether Toffoli will continue to vote on the matter and how the judiciary plans to address criticisms regarding the lack of transparency and appropriateness of the meeting logistics, but the court did not provide a response.

The Supreme Court publicly announced on Thursday, the 12th, that Toffoli would be stepping down from the case at his own request, emphasizing a desire for procedural integrity. However, the situation raises broader issues about the accountability of judicial processes in Brazil, particularly concerning how decisions are made and communicated within the highest court, and whether the public trust in the judiciary is being compromised amidst such opaque procedures.