Following the meeting that led to Dias Toffoli's removal from the Master case, a sense of distrust towards Supreme Court President Edson Fachin was palpable among ministers. At least four justices expressed dissatisfaction with Fachin's decision to advance a report prepared by the Federal Police against a fellow member of the court without judicial oversight, igniting serious concerns about the breach of procedural norms.

Additionally, during a closed-door meeting, Fachin faced criticism for his insistence that the challenge against Toffoli's impartiality be taken to a public vote on Friday. Many ministers viewed this insistence as reckless, suggesting it could lead to a public spectacle that would embarrass and damage the reputation of one of their own. Such actions, they argue, are unbecoming of a president of the Supreme Court, who is expected to maintain collegial harmony and protect the institution's integrity.

The situation highlights a broader concern within the court regarding the handling of sensitive cases and the implications of undermining trust among justices, which could affect not only internal dynamics but also the court's authority and public perception. As Fachin navigates this crisis, the potential for further destabilization in the Brazilian judiciary looms, particularly if trust among court members continues to erode.