Regys Freitas, the former rector of the State University of Roraima (UERR), recently received a perfect performance evaluation score from current rector Cláudio Travassos Delicato, even as he faces serious allegations of attempting to destroy evidence related to a multi-million-dollar embezzlement investigation. The performance evaluation was published in the State Official Gazette, raising eyebrows given the context of the ongoing investigation. The evaluation highlights a complex relationship, as Cláudio Travassos Delicato was vice-rector under Freitas's administration and is also a witness in the legal proceedings against him.

The timing of this evaluation is particularly controversial, coming on the same day that the Public Ministry requested the arrest of Regys Freitas in connection with the allegations. Despite the serious nature of the accusations he is facing, the decision to award him a high score raises questions about accountability within the institution and the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms in place. There is concern that such actions might undermine trust in the university’s leadership and governance amidst a critical moment in its administration.

The current rector, Delicato, has yet to publicly comment on the situation following media inquiries, leaving many puzzled about the rationale behind the timing and nature of the evaluation. As this case unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the intricate relationship between educational institutions and governance, particularly in scenarios fraught with allegations of misconduct, and indicates a potential need for reform in evaluation practices within UERR and similar institutions.