The Federal Criminal Cassation Chamber confirmed the conditions of former President Cristina Kirchner's house arrest, maintaining the use of an electronic ankle monitor. The ruling, issued by judges Gustavo Hornos and Diego Barroetaveña, rejected a request to remove the tracking device, affirming the established security measures while she serves her six-year sentence related to the 'Vialidad' case. Moreover, the decision imposed constraints on the number of visitors allowed at her residence, reinforcing the prison-like conditions of her house arrest.

This judicial ruling comes as Kirchner, who served as Argentina's President from 2007 to 2015, faces corruption charges linked to public works contracts during her administration. The retention of the ankle monitor illustrates the Argentine judicial system's approach to ensuring compliance with the terms set for her house arrest. Kirchner’s legal team had sought more lenient treatment, highlighting the tension between judicial oversight and the rights of high-profile defendants.

The implications of this ruling extend beyond Kirchner's individual case, as it reflects broader themes within Argentine politics regarding accountability for public figures. As the nation grapples with issues of corruption and the legal system's efficacy, this case continues to provoke discussions about the intersection of politics and justice in Argentina, particularly involving prominent leaders.