The Federal Criminal Cassation Chamber of Argentina has upheld the restrictions imposed on former President Cristina Kirchner regarding her house arrest. The judges ruled against a request from Kirchner's defense team to remove her electronic ankle monitor and expand her visitation hours and the number of simultaneous visitors allowed. The decision was made by a majority of judges, Gustavo Hornos and Diego Barroetaveña, while judge Mariano Borinsky dissented, supporting the defense's request for more leniency.

Kirchner, who has been sentenced to six years in prison, is currently serving her sentence under house arrest at her residence. The court's ruling reinforces the penalties imposed upon her due to her conviction, reflecting ongoing tensions in Argentine politics and the judiciary's role in matters involving high-profile figures. The case sheds light on the broader implications for judicial independence and the treatment of political leaders in legal troubles.

The rejection of Kirchner's request indicates that the judiciary remains firm in maintaining the conditions set by the lower courts, emphasizing a strict approach to legal compliance. This decision may have political ramifications, affecting not only Kirchner's personal circumstances but also her party's dynamics and public perception as they navigate the ongoing challenges associated with governance and corruption allegations in Argentina.