The IV Chamber of the Cassation Court in Argentina rejected the requests made by Cristina Kirchner regarding the conditions of her house arrest at San José 1111. With a majority vote, the court decided that the former president, who has been convicted of corruption in the Vialidad case, must continue to wear an electronic ankle bracelet and adhere to restrictions on the number of visits she can receive. Additionally, she is limited to using the terrace for only two hours each day.

In a 131-page ruling, the highest criminal court, comprising Gustavo Hornos, Mariano Borinsky, and Diego Barroetaveña, addressed the complaints filed by the former leader seeking to nullify the restrictions imposed on her house arrest. The court's decision comes in the wake of the Supreme Court of Justice affirming the sentencing verdict, which condemned Cristina Kirchner to six years in prison for the crime of fraudulent administration harming the State. This ruling reinforces the legal stance against her, highlighting the ongoing legal challenges she faces.

The implications of this ruling are significant as they reflect not only the legal battles that Kirchner continues to face but also the broader political and social context in Argentina regarding corruption and accountability. As a prominent figure in Argentine politics, the enforcement of these restrictions illustrates the judiciary's commitment to uphold the law, which may resonate with public sentiments seeking justice while also adding to the polarization surrounding Kirchner's legacy.