Lithuania's decision to accept a portion of migrants allocated under the EU's new migration mechanism has sparked controversy and criticism, particularly from social media users who express concerns about national solidarity and government policies. An image circulating on Facebook indicated that while Lithuania would take in half of the migrants, it would also be financially responsible for the other half. In contrast, Poland, Latvia, and Estonia have chosen to refuse any migrants, leading to accusations against the Lithuanian government of betrayal and a lack of solidarity among the Baltic states.

Critics have taken to social media to express their dissatisfaction, with many targeting President Gitanas Nausėda for what they perceive as Lithuania's submissive attitude towards the European Union. Comments decrying Lithuania's role as a 'puppet' to Brussels highlight a deep-seated frustration among some citizens regarding the government’s immigration and EU policies. Furthermore, the accusations of 'eurocommunism' and treason among politicians and the conservative party illustrate the polarized political climate in the country, where consensus on immigration remains deeply fragmented.

This development brings to light significant implications for Lithuania’s position within the EU and its relationship with neighboring countries. As Lithuania moves forward with its commitments, dissent from citizens and polarization in the political sphere may complicate the implementation of this EU mechanism in practice. The reactions underscore the ongoing sensitivity around the EU's migration policies and how they resonate within national contexts, especially in countries wary of demographic changes and external pressures on citizenship and identity.