The Supreme Court of Brazil (STF) is currently embroiled in the political turmoil surrounding the Master case, perceived as making negligible headway in resolving the situation. The Court's decision to partially sideline Justice Dias Toffoli was accompanied by a communication that many view as displaying undue corporativism, suggesting that the Court may not genuinely believe it can suppress the ongoing political repercussions. This sentiment highlights a broader frustration that the institution is merely performing a symbolic gesture rather than implementing effective solutions.

Several STF ministers are circulating a theory about the potential scale of the implications tied to the figures involved in the Master case, particularly focusing on Daniel Vorcaro. This underscores the concern that the consequences could be extensive, hinting that an eventual judicial compromise might be unavoidable in light of the damage already done. The fear is that nearly everyone involved—from key players in the financial market to regulatory bodies and various politicians—has been affected negatively by the scandal.

Consequently, this atmosphere of caution is evident within the Brazilian government and Congress. Despite the silence surrounding official admissions of fear regarding the fallout, there is a palpable apprehension about the political stability of various institutions. With numerous stakeholders involved, the implications of the case not only threaten the integrity of political figures but also expose weaknesses in critical regulatory frameworks, adding layers of complexity to an already volatile political situation.