In a closed-door meeting, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) took the unprecedented step of removing Minister Dias Toffoli from the relativity of the Master case. This decision has sparked discussions about perceived corporatism within the court, as historically, a minister’s withdrawal from a case has always been a self-declared choice rather than an external imposition. For the first time, the plenary has interfered in this process, raising eyebrows regarding institutional integrity and judicial independence.

The removal comes in the wake of revelations about communications between Toffoli and banker Daniel Vorcaro related to transactions that could compromise the integrity of the case. Despite the gravity of the situation, the court chose not to officially declare Toffoli suspicious, thereby maintaining a facade of self-preservation. Legal experts consulted by Folha have voiced concerns over this incident, interpreting it as evidence of a deeper crisis within the STF, highlighting its struggle to acknowledge and rectify its internal missteps.

Professor Luiz Fernando Esteves from Insper characterized the decision as both 'historical' and 'strange', pointing out that all members of the court voted against Toffoli’s suspicion. The prevailing response indicates a troubling inclination towards maintaining solidarity among ministers rather than addressing potential ethical violations, suggesting that this move might not only reflect current tensions but also indicate ongoing challenges in upholding judicial accountability within Brazil’s highest court.