In Mexico, civil organizations, justice experts, and opposition senators have expressed strong concerns regarding a legislative proposal to permit judges to remain anonymous—termed 'faceless judges'—in cases related to organized crime. They argue that this measure directly contradicts international legal standards and undermines the accusatory penal system, posing risks of misuse and contributing to a culture of impunity without effectively tackling the underlying issues of organized crime. This group of critics emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability within the judicial system, especially in sensitive cases involving organized crime.

Senator Javier Corral, President of the Justice Commission and a member of the ruling party, acknowledged the delicacy of the proposal and stressed the necessity for thorough examination before any legislative decision is made. He expressed the importance of taking adequate time to analyze the potential ramifications of introducing faceless judges, indicating that while the proposal may be discussed in the current legislative session, careful scrutiny is essential to ensure the protection of human rights and legal principles. Corral's comments reflect an awareness of the broader implications for justice in Mexico, where public trust in the legal system is already tenuous.

The alarming sentiment voiced by these organizations and lawmakers resonates with ongoing debates regarding judicial reform in Mexico, particularly in the context of the battle against organized crime. Critics argue that the introduction of faceless judges could set a precedent for further measures that erode the integrity of the judicial system, risking greater state control and less public oversight. As this discussion progresses in the nation's legislature, the stakes remain high for both the effectiveness of the justice system and the protection of individual rights in Mexico.