The NGO Forum of Studies on Justice Administration (FORES) has highlighted the urgent need for the Judicial Council to approve an Ethics Code for judges, triggered by concerns surrounding the behavior of Judge Carlos Mahiques. Mahiques reportedly celebrated his birthday at a property associated with the Argentine Football Association (AFA), raising questions about his impartiality as he is set to rule on a case involving the AFA. This incident has brought attention to the conduct of judges in settings beyond their judicial roles, sparking a debate about ethical standards in the judiciary.

FORES' statement emphasized that judges must uphold dignity, independence, and integrity, maintaining the highest moral standards while performing their duties. The organization criticized the apparent conflicts of interest that may arise when judges engage in activities that can compromise their objectivity. As public trust in the judiciary is paramount, the call for a structured Ethics Code aims to enhance accountability and transparency, ensuring that judges act in accordance with their responsibilities to the public.

In light of this situation, the discussion about judicial ethics is particularly relevant in Argentina, where the independence of the judiciary has been scrutinized in past cases. Implementing an Ethics Code could potentially mitigate risks of bias and restore public confidence in the judicial system, reinforcing the idea that the judiciary remains a pillar of democracy and justice in the country.