In Jelgava, Latvia, the city council is conducting a survey regarding the renaming of two streets, one designated after the controversial figure Sudraba Edžus and the other after notable economist Jānis Bisenieks. Historian Andris Tomašūns has criticized the naming of streets after individuals, citing the problematic history of Sudraba Edžus, who was associated with secret police in Soviet Russia. Tomašūns proposes that the street named after Edžus should revert to its former name, Dīķa Street.

The second street in question, Prohorova Street, is suggested to be renamed in honor of Jānis Bisenieks. Rita Vectirāne, a board member of the Jānis Bisenieka fonds and a member of the Green and Farmers' Union, emphasizes Bisenieks' significance as an outstanding economist and underscores the importance of individuals and their stories in shaping a city. The council's survey aims to gauge public opinion on the proposed name changes, which reflect broader discussions about community values and historical representation.

This initiative comes amid ongoing debates in Latvia about how public spaces should honor historical figures. With a growing sensitivity to the past conduct of individuals who have been memorialized through street names, the Jelgava city council's decision could set a precedent for similar evaluations across the country. As citizens participate in this survey, their responses may influence future naming conventions and public memorials in Latvia, highlighting the relationship between history, identity, and communal narratives.