Feb 11 • 06:00 UTC 🇪🇸 Spain El País

Who Decided That Science Wasn't for Them?

The article discusses the gender gap in science, arguing that it begins in school and is influenced by a lack of role models and societal messages that discourage girls from pursuing science.

This piece explores the pervasive gender gap in science, asserting that it originates far earlier than university, tracing it back to educational settings where girls often lack inspirational figures. The article emphasizes the critical contributions of women like Ada Lovelace, Rosalind Franklin, and Katherine Johnson to scientific advancements, framing a hypothetical world devoid of these innovations due to the absence of these pioneering women.

Furthermore, it highlights the challenge faced by many girls who are subtly pushed away from science due to societal norms and expectations, which often dictate what subjects are deemed appropriate or attainable for them. By illustrating the historical achievements of women in science, the article advocates for better representation and encouragement of girls in STEM fields from an early age.

The conversation is crucial in understanding the implications of gender disparities in science, not just for women but for society as a whole. Encouraging girls in science can lead to groundbreaking advancements that benefit everyone, ultimately fostering a more equitable and innovative future. This issue transcends individual aspirations, impacting the collective progress of science as a discipline.

📡 Similar Coverage