Seongdongwon Requests Confidentiality Decision from Ganghwa County on Sexual Violence Investigation Report
The facility Seongdongwon in Incheon is attempting to keep a sexual violence investigation report confidential, despite the Ganghwa County's plan to partially disclose it to victims.
In Incheon, South Korea, the facility Seongdongwon, which houses individuals with severe disabilities, has requested that its sexual violence investigation report remain confidential. This report, requested by both Seongdongwon and its director, appears to contain allegations that all resident women have suffered sexual abuse. Despite these requests, Ganghwa County officials, led by Mayor Park Yong-cheol, have indicated their intention to partially disclose the report to the victims on March 11, suggesting that the information made public will address serious concerns about abuse in the facility. However, they note that this disclosure may be delayed if Seongdongwon pursues administrative litigation regarding the confidentiality request.
The decision to partially disclose comes after the county held an information disclosure review meeting where victims requested access to the report, which was compiled following a comprehensive study involving 19 residents. Mayor Park emphasized the county's commitment to transparency, handling the matter with utmost seriousness given the implications for the victims' rights and the broader societal responsibilities to protect the vulnerable. The facility has argued its case based on laws protecting sensitive information and business secrets, with these considerations now in a legal limbo pending the outcome of potential legal actions against the county's decision.
Ganghwa County officials made clear that if law enforcement confirms any sexual abuse claims made against the facility's director, they would take immediate administrative action, including possible closure of the facility. The ongoing situation highlights the delicate balance between the need for transparency in public institutions and the protections afforded to organizations accused of serious misconduct. As the community watches these developments, the outcomes could set important precedents in handling such sensitive issues that impact public trust and institutional accountability.