R. Malinauskas, a Lithuanian politician, has expressed his apprehension regarding the planned Kapčiamiesčio polygon, specifically demanding clarity on its intended use and the arguments supporting its establishment in a sensitive ecological area. He emphasizes that if the polygon is merely for training purposes, it raises questions about why it needs to be situated in an area dense with forests, such as the one that consists of five protected areas. Malinauskas believes that sacrificing this vast natural landscape for the sake of training is illogical and should be reconsidered.

Additionally, concerns are echoed by the Mayor of Druskininkai municipality, which borders the area intended for the new polygon. He contests the argument that local residents are accustomed to the noise of military exercises from a nearby polygon in Belarus, stating that such reasoning fails to justify military activities in the area. The local leadership's apprehensions suggest a broader community discomfort regarding military operations so close to populated areas and natural reserves.

Overall, the ongoing debate highlights the tension between national defense needs and environmental conservation in Lithuania, as local officials and residents advocate for a review of military project locations to mitigate potential disturbances and ecological damage. This discourse reflects the importance placed on maintaining the balance between defense preparedness and protecting Lithuania's natural resources.