In a recent evaluation, Federico Tedeschini, a legal scholar, described the actions of the Italian Supreme Court as 'almost a coup d'état'. He argues that at least two members of the court should have recused themselves from the decision regarding the referendum on constitutional reform. Tedeschini critiques the court's decision to alter the referendum question, emphasizing that this change lacks a valid basis since it undermines the core principle of common sense in law, particularly as the referendum is meant to confirm, not reject, existing legislative changes.

According to Tedeschini, the court's decision conflicts with the straightforward nature of the referendum, which asks citizens to either affirm or reject a proposed constitutional change related to justice. He asserts that the original question posed by lawmakers was sufficiently clear and should have been retained. The implications of this judicial decision raise significant concerns about the integrity and consistency of legal processes in Italy, potentially eroding public trust in judicial institutions.

The article leaves readers pondering the next steps following this controversial ruling. With public sentiment and legal expectations now in flux, experts are questioning how this will impact the upcoming referendum and what ramifications there may be for future legislative initiatives, as the stability of legal procedures could come into question based on this recent judgment.