In Italy, the aftermath of the Supreme Court's ruling on a new justice referendum question has prompted a cabinet meeting scheduled for noon. This decision effectively undermines the ruling government's belief that gathering 500,000 signatures against the referendum would be futile. Justice Minister Nordio has indicated the possibility of postponing the referendum date, a consideration that had not been on the table before this latest development. Meanwhile, the pro-referendum committee, led by lawyer Carlo Guglielmi, is preparing to push the government to delay the voting days originally set for March 22 and 23.

The collective response from the fifteen jurists who succeeded in obtaining the modification of the referendum question presents a moment of significant achievement for them. They expressed their satisfaction through a joint statement emphasizing their determination to advance the referendum process. This wave of support from legal experts indicates a strong backing for the initiative, which could play a pivotal role in the discussion surrounding justice reform in Italy.

This situation highlights the ongoing tension between the government and various advocacy groups regarding judicial policies and reforms. As the cabinet prepares to deliberate, the implications of this referendum could affect not only the legal landscape in Italy but also the government's stability and public opinion on justice-related matters. The cabinet's decision and the subsequent actions by both supporters and opponents of the referendum will be crucial in shaping the future of justice reform initiatives in Italy.