The reform cancels the last totalitarian remnant. Some judges wear the toga like transformists
Italy's upcoming constitutional referendum on justice reform scheduled for March 22-23 is causing significant political debate, with proponents planning a vigorous campaign amid criticisms.
In Italy, the date for the referendum on justice reform remains set for March 22-23, despite various legal challenges posed by opponents. These opponents sought to modify the question posed to voters but were unsuccessful in moving the date itself. The reform in question focuses on the separation of judicial careers, which has become a contentious issue among lawmakers and various stakeholders. As the reform gains traction, it is met with significant resistance that forecasts dire consequences in the judiciary.
Giorgio Mulè, Deputy Speaker of the Chamber and member of Forza Italia, emphasizes the importance of this referendum, claiming that it represents a vital civil rights issue rather than a mere party matter. Mulè reflects on the organized efforts by supporters of the reform, revealing plans for 350 local events aimed at educating the public and countering the negative narratives circulated by reform opponents. He humorously criticizes the alarmist rhetoric of the opponents, suggesting that their predictions are exaggerated to the point of invoking locust invasions, as they lack substantial arguments against the separation of careers.
As the campaign for the referendum officially kicks off, it signals a critical moment in Italian politics concerning judicial reform. With the government backing the measures, the public discourse surrounding the reform is likely to intensify as both sides mobilize their supporters. The outcome of this referendum could reshape the judicial landscape in Italy, impacting how judges function and interact within the system, further igniting ideological battles between proponents of reform and those wary of perceived encroachments on judicial independence.