In the aftermath of what is described as the worst referendum campaign in history, the author expresses his commitment to voting 'Yes' due to personal conviction and experience. He argues that the proposed reform is necessary to ensure transparency regarding principles that have been previously integrated into the Constitution, which pertain to the separation of careers between judges and public prosecutors. This longstanding issue, which has been debated for 37 years and received prior approvals from a majority in Parliament, seeks to define clear roles within the judicial process, establishing distinct functions for the two parties involved and a neutral judge.

The author reflects on his past experiences, particularly a personal injustice he faced as a senator—being unfairly judged by a prosecutor with a history of holding multiple influential positions. He describes the absurdity of being labeled a criminal by the judiciary while simultaneously being supported by 40 fellow senators who rejected his dismissal from the Senate. This paradox illustrates the urgent need for reforms that would prevent such conflicts of interest and clarify the judicial process, thereby ensuring fairness and justice within the governmental framework.

Ultimately, the article calls for active civic engagement in the upcoming referendum, encouraging voters to prioritize the long-term benefits of judicial reform over the disappointing electoral history. By making the roles of judges and prosecutors more transparent, the reform is seen as a crucial step toward a fairer legal system that can prevent the politicization of judicial power and restore confidence in the legislative and judicial branches of government.