In a letter exchange, a reader expresses confusion regarding a upcoming referendum on justice reform in Italy due to its technical nature. The writer of the response, likely a journalist or commentator, acknowledges this confusion and emphasizes that the complexities of legal language often alienate ordinary citizens. They reassure Nicola that the crux of the matter is simpler than it appears.

The response asserts that this referendum is about choosing between a justice system that is more balanced, efficient, and guarantees rights, rather than a technical legal debate. The writer declares their intention to vote 'yes' and implies that understanding the broader implications of the reform is crucial for voters. They argue that the reform is not targeting judges or the judiciary negatively, but rather aims to improve the overall justice landscape in Italy.

By framing the referendum in these terms, the article invites readers to consider the importance of participating in the democratic process, especially when it pertains to issues that directly affect their lives. The goal is to encourage informed voting by breaking down complex ideas into more digestible concepts, thus urging readers to feel empowered rather than alienated by the jargon of legal experts.