In a new pamphlet circulating in Slovenia, advocates for a referendum on judicial reform are countering accusations of threats to democracy, arguing that claims against the reform are merely 'fake news.' The publication addresses several key criticisms, including the alarms raised about separating the careers of judges and prosecutors, which opponents claim could undermine democratic institutions. However, proponents assert that this separation is already successfully implemented in several European countries without leading to any institutional crises.

The pamphlet challenges the narrative that the reform poses a risk of subordination of prosecutors to the government. Supporters argue that the reform actually enhances the independence of the judiciary and aligns with practices seen in established democracies like Germany, Spain, and Portugal. By debunking these myths, the document aims to rally public support and reassure voters about the potential benefits of the changes being proposed.

This communication strategy appears to be part of a broader effort to shift the public conversation surrounding the referendum from fear-based rhetoric to a fact-based discussion. With the referendum anticipated to be a critical juncture for judicial reform in Slovenia, the pamphlet seeks to clarify the intentions behind the changes and to mobilize voters who may be swayed by misinformation.