The article critiques the current referendum by emphasizing the need to evaluate the merit and quality of the technical solutions presented. It poses a rhetorical question about the average person's understanding of the choices on the ballot, suggesting that many may be confused about the implications of having one or two governing structures. This highlights a disconnect between political discourse and public comprehension.

Additionally, the piece addresses the political landscape surrounding the referendum, noting that all ruling parties are aligned in their support for a 'yes' vote, which raises concerns about the genuine expression of public opinion. The author seems to suggest that political allegiance overshadows individuals' ability to form impartial judgments about the referendum's content, hinting at a herd mentality driven by party loyalty.

Ultimately, the call to vote against the referendum is underscored by a plea for critical evaluation rather than blind adherence to political directives. The article warns that the choices presented are not as straightforward as they may appear, urging voters to consider the broader implications of their decisions beyond mere political allegiance.