The article discusses concerns about AI's bias against the referendum on judicial reform in Italy, suggesting that such technologies may misrepresent the debate due to their reliance on political or structured sources.
The article argues that AI models like ChatGPT and Gemini are allegedly biased against the pro-referendum side by producing analyses that could influence undecided voters. Citing a report by Reputation Manager, it suggests that these AI systems tend to draw from heavily indexed and politically slanted sources, which risks undermining impartiality. The piece highlights how AI responses can shape public perception and suggests that they are not offering unbiased technical comparisons, especially regarding the independence of the judiciary, which is a key issue in the currently proposed reforms.
The discussion initiates a broader conversation on the role of AI in shaping democratic processes, particularly in Italy's judicial reforms. The article points out a shift in the characterization of prosecutors from
