The article discusses the unprecedented institutional tensions in Brazil, particularly focusing on the Supreme Federal Court (STF), which has become a frontline defender of democratic order against authoritarian threats. The author emphasizes that the STF's vigorous role in upholding democracy, especially during attempts of coups, has subjected it to attempts of 'impeachment' and efforts to undermine its authority. This situation raises the question of whether the impeachment process for STF ministers should be more effective.

However, the author warns that asking for a more effective impeachment process could be misleading or dangerous. The argument is made that, in a democratic state, the effectiveness of any control mechanism should not be judged solely by how easily a magistrate can be removed from office. Instead, it should reflect the mechanism's ability to protect the integrity of institutions and maintain judicial independence, which are crucial in guaranteeing democracy. The focus on ease of removal may lead to a weakening of the judiciary's role in society.

The article concludes that the potential institutional disarray resulting from a relaxation of impeachment procedures is not merely a theoretical concern but a genuine threat to Brazil's democratic fabric. Such changes could lead to significant consequences for the balance of power within the state, impacting the overall stability of governance and the rule of law in the country.