In his article, Robert Gwiazdowski reflects on the disputes regarding the appointment of judges to the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, which has become a significant issue in recent years. He reminds readers about the selection of five judges by the Sejm during the seventh and eighth terms, and the subsequent controversy concerning the constitutional legality of two of these judges' appointments due to their predecessors' mandates expiring after the new Sejm's session had begun. This situation has raised questions about the adherence to constitutional procedures in the judiciary's appointments, showcasing an ongoing struggle for rule of law in Poland.

Gwiazdowski also notes the appointment of six judges by the Sejm of the tenth term in 2026, raising uncertainties about whether these selections adhere to previous Constitutional Tribunal interpretations. He points out that three of these judges were reportedly appointed based on the Tribunal's interpretation from a 2015 ruling, yet their status appears to be in limbo, suggesting a lack of clear communication and adherence to constitutional norms within the judicial system. This uncertainty contributes to the atmosphere of rivalry and distrust surrounding the judiciary's integrity.

The article emphasizes the importance of a technocratic model of constitutional oversight, where judicial powers are entrusted to experts, in order to ensure fair and lawful governance. However, continuous disputes over judicial appointments underline fundamental challenges to the rule of law in Poland, with potential implications for democracy and governance in the country, calling into question the stability and impartiality of its judicial system.