In a recent interview, Dele Farotimi criticized the African Action Congress (AAC), labeling it an unserious political party. This remark prompted a defense from proponents of the AAC, who argue that the party is anchored in socialist policies and ideologies. They contest Farotimi's perspective, highlighting that he operates under a traditional political mindset that favors compromise with the ruling elites, a method they believe has failed Nigeria in the past.

The article further elaborates on the AAC's commitment to ideologically grounded politics, contrasting it with Farotimi's view that effective political engagement requires conformity to existing power structures. Supporters of the AAC express discontent with this notion, asserting that aligning with entrenched political players has failed to bring about meaningful change in the country's governance. They recommend that critics like Farotimi reconsider their understanding of political seriousness, which they define as steadfast adherence to principles rather than a willingness to compromise for political gain.

Lastly, the piece suggests that the political establishment in Nigeria should be introspected, as many voices in the opposition and ruling class are intertwined with the very issues plaguing the country. It calls for a reassessment of what constitutes a serious political agenda, urging a shift from the conventional means of political reconciliation to a more principled approach that genuinely addresses the socio-economic issues Nigeria faces today.