With just a week until the referendum on justice in Italy, the discourse has taken a troubling turn towards aggression and alarmist rhetoric. The author expresses disappointment over the lack of a calm and civilized debate, dedicating the article to highlight those in the 'No' camp who have resorted to inflammatory remarks that overshadow constructive discussion. The focus is specifically on three individuals, suggesting that their comments reflect a broader trend of hostility in the political landscape.

In the third position on the dubious podium of critics, Tomaso Montanari's statements are noted, along with some of his peers who have engaged in comparably extreme assertions. The article references figures like Nicola Gratteri, the prosecutor from Naples, who suggests that the only people voting 'yes' are individuals with criminal backgrounds, including the accused and investigated. Similarly, it mentions Nino Di Matteo's accusations that votes in favor will come from those within corrupt systems, including Freemasons and mafia affiliates, further inflaming the polarizing atmosphere.

The author urges readers to reflect on the implications of these hostile interactions as they might deter rational debate around crucial reforms. By selecting the language of conflict rather than cooperation, these vocal opponents of proposed changes risk alienating voters who might otherwise engage with the referendum based on informed discussions rather than fearmongering. Through this critique, the article advocates for a more constructive approach to the upcoming vote, emphasizing the importance of maintaining respect in political dialogue for the health of democracy in Italy.