In Jēkabpils, a young man named Krists was involved in a car accident that severely damaged his Subaru. He claims that law enforcement unjustly considers him the cause of the crash and feels that the assessment is unfair. The incident has led to a controversy regarding the responsibility for the accident as Krists finds himself without coverage under KASKO, meaning he won't receive compensation from the other party's OCTA insurance due to the police's verdict.

Krists asserts that he followed traffic signals and adhered to driving regulations prior to the accident, which puts him at odds with the police's findings. He believes that improvements in traffic organization and additional signage at the intersection where the accident occurred are necessary to prevent dangerous situations in the future. This perspective highlights his frustration with what he perceives as a flawed traffic system that may have contributed to the mishap.

However, traffic safety expert Oskars Irbītis disagrees with Krists' view, suggesting that Krists' refusal to accept any fault is a last-ditch effort to secure financial compensation and avoid the implications of being deemed responsible for the accident. The differing views between the young driver and the expert illustrate the complexities surrounding traffic accidents and the challenges in navigating the aftermath, particularly about insurance claims and accountability.