The article discusses the recent military actions taken by the US and Israel against Iran, expressing significant concerns over two key objections. Firstly, it highlights that such actions violate international law as they have not received approval from the United Nations and the Security Council. Secondly, the article argues that even the most tyrannical regimes should be dismantled by their own people rather than through foreign interventions, suggesting that external actions can undermine national sovereignty.

While the objections mentioned are valid, the article also points out the inherent flaws within international law itself, notably its lack of enforcement mechanisms. It suggests that reliance on international institutions such as the UN or the International Court of Justice for judgments or penalties could lead to prolonged inaction, which may be counterproductive in pressing situations. This could lead to scenarios where nations act unilaterally, questioning the efficacy and relevance of international law in contemporary geopolitics.

Further, the article provides a hypothetical scenario where an international body might rule against Greece's military presence in the Eastern Aegean Islands, raising doubts about the willingness of the Greek government to comply with such a ruling amid tensions with Turkey. This reflection points to broader implications of foreign judgments on national security and governance, particularly in volatile regional contexts.