The ongoing investigation into the 'residences case', which centers around the handling of care facilities during a crisis, is facing significant delays and interruptions. Most recent developments included the refusal of Summa 112's ambulance chief, Pablo Busca, to testify, alongside assertions from triage protocol drafter, Javier Peromingo, who criticized the initial versions of the documents as discriminatory. As various parties gather in Getafe for yet another session lacking momentum, they are keenly anticipating a pivotal court date. On April 16, the Provincial Court's panel of three judges will evaluate whether to consolidate the existing investigations into a single macro-case. This decision could greatly influence the trajectory of the inquiry, which has thus far been marred by procedural complications and a lack of clarity. The potential unification of the case promises a more streamlined judicial process, enabling a comprehensive assessment of the allegations surrounding the residential care sector. The implications of this court decision are vast, not only for the individuals involved but also for broader public trust in the handling of care facilities in crisis situations. If the macro-case is launched, it may uncover systemic issues within care practices and potentially hold officials accountable for failures during crucial times. The outcome of the April meeting could set a significant precedent for similar investigations in the future, further highlighting the need for accountability in public health management.