In a recent report released on February 27, the United Nations Human Rights Commission in South Sudan accused Ugandan forces of collaborating with the South Sudanese army in operations that resulted in civilian casualties. The allegations raised serious concerns about the conduct of both armies amid ongoing tensions in the region. In response, the Ugandan army issued a statement on March 10, firmly rejecting the accusations and defending its operations in South Sudan.

The Ugandan Ministry of Defense emphasized the army's historical commitment to civilian protection, stating, "Never in its 45 years of history has the Ugandan army targeted civilians, which is why it enjoys popularity wherever it has operated." The ministry highlighted that the Ugandan operations not only prevented further conflicts in the capital, Juba but also thwarted attacks on civilians by a local militia known as the White Army, composed of the Nuer ethnic group. This self-defense narrative was aimed at countering the negative portrayal by the UN report.

The implications of this dispute are significant, as accusations of civilian targeting could strain Uganda's military relations with South Sudan and affect regional stability. The Ugandan army's insistence on its protective role may influence public perception in both countries, potentially exacerbating or alleviating tensions depending on how the situation evolves. As the situation unfolds, it remains crucial for international observers to monitor the operations and their impact on the civilian population in South Sudan.