The article reflects on the ongoing discourse in Italy regarding fascism and anti-fascism, drawing from the thoughts of Ennio Flaiano, who suggested that Italian fascists can be categorized into two groups: fascists and antifascists. This commentary comes against the backdrop of calls for a renewed resistance by Milan's Mayor Beppe Sala, which some view as a superficial gesture that fails to address deeper societal issues. The reference to municipal plans such as bike lanes and anti-Mussolini declarations illustrates a sense of disillusionment with current political actions that prioritize symbolism over genuine change.

Furthermore, the commentary critiques the difficulty of finding historical fascist symbols in present-day Italy, implying that true manifestations of fascism may be rare or non-existent. The absence of direct, violent fascist groups is contrasted with comments on symbolic gestures, such as the Roman salutes seen during memorial events, which complicate the public's response to historical and contemporary fascism. This perspective suggests that public discourses around fascism may often ignore the existing, more pressing issues of violence in society that could be classified as 'real' threats, rather than focusing solely on ideological symbols.

Ultimately, the article presents a nuanced examination of the political landscape in Italy, questioning the motivations and efficacy of modern anti-fascism efforts while urging a broader understanding of what constitutes violence and extremism today. It calls for a reflection on the state of political activism in Italy, suggesting that merely labeling opponents as fascists or antifascists may overlook significant social challenges that need to be addressed.