The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Korea has voiced significant concerns regarding a proposed amendment to the anti-terrorism law that seeks to broaden the definition of terrorism to encompass actions targeting the democratic organization and activities of political parties. During a meeting, the commission's members unanimously agreed that this broader definition poses serious risks of infringing upon fundamental rights. Specifically, adding a subjective criterion of obstructing political party activities into the terrorism definition could precariously categorize vigorous political criticism and protests as acts of terrorism. This scenario may discourage citizens from engaging in political expressions or activities due to fear of being labeled as terrorists for their lawful dissent.

Moreover, the NHRC highlighted potential violations of the right to privacy, freedom, and personal data autonomy that could arise from this amendment. According to Park Eun-sil, a director at the NHRC, there is a legitimate concern that individuals might self-censor their political beliefs or activities out of fear that strong criticism or protests could be perceived as terroristic actions. The commission members emphasized the necessity for careful review of the proposed amendment, arguing that such political actions should be clearly regulated under existing laws like the criminal law or election law without being redrawn under the terrorism framework.

In light of these discussions, the NHRC is set to communicate its official stance to the National Assembly, emphasizing the need for a cautious examination of how the proposed changes might impinge upon constitutional freedoms, particularly the right to free expression and assembly guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution, as well as the right to privacy protected under Article 17. They stressed that any legal adjustments should maintain a clear distinction to protect fundamental rights and freedoms in political discourse and activity.