Yle's documentary series, which reflects on the struggle for gender equality over the past decades, has sparked lively discussions on social media, particularly on Facebook. The uproar centers around a segment featuring Elisabeth Rehn's treatment in the 1994 presidential election debate, where male journalists posed questions that many found disrespectful and inappropriate. These included inquiries about her demeanor concerning her femininity, suggesting that being a woman might somehow diminish her credibility as a candidate.

The discussions have highlighted the pervasive gender biases in media portrayals of female political figures, with commentators expressing disbelief and outrage over the nature of the questions posed to Rehn. Many users are questioning whether similar inquiries would ever be directed at male candidates, casting light on the double standards that exist in political media. Posts such as those by a user named Maiju, who gained over 700 likes for her critique of the question's absurdity, illustrate the sentiment that these types of queries are steeped in sexism.

The widespread reaction, with comments ranging from disappointment to outright condemnation of the interrogating journalists, demonstrates the continued relevance of gender issues in modern politics. As more viewers engage with these discussions, the series not only sheds light on historical events but also encourages contemporary audiences to critically assess how women are treated in the public eye. The implications of this debate extend beyond just entertainment, as it urges a reevaluation of how political space is constructed and the necessity for media reform in portraying women leaders fairly.