Leszek Mazur has publicly declared his decision not to enter the race for a new term in the National Judiciary Council (KRS), reflecting a broader context of political turmoil surrounding the institution. He metaphorically referenced the wisdom of avoiding the same river twice to indicate that he views his previous tenure and the ensuing political landscape as fundamentally changed, marking an end to that chapter of his career.

Mazur's remarks highlight the current discord within Poland regarding the KRS, illustrating the stark division between competing political factions and their divergent visions for the council's functionality. He referenced the period from 2018 to 2022 as one of relative clarity, where judicial candidates were independently supported by judges and selected by the Sejm, contrasting with the current proposals that prioritize judge assemblies and associations in collaboration with the legislature, which have raised concerns about their diminishing role in the election process.

This decision not to run underscores the challenges faced by the KRS within the context of Poland's judiciary, which is increasingly enveloped in political disputes. The lack of solutions to these ongoing conflicts suggests a complex future for judicial governance in Poland, with implications that may affect the independence of the judiciary and the balance of power between the branches of government, as well as public trust in the rule of law.