The police inspection in Slovakia is facing criticism for allegedly applying a double standard when it comes to the treatment of detainees. This has come to light through two resolutions issued by investigators from the Internal Affairs Inspectorate. Although the cases were examined at different times and locations, they both involved Ján Čurila, and each resolution reflects a contrasting stance on what constitutes an appropriate level of police treatment for detainees.

In the first instance, the police deemed the strict approach taken against Ján Čurila and his co-defendant Pavol Ďurka as acceptable, suggesting that maintaining stringent conditions in custody can be justified for certain individuals. However, the second resolution, which scrutinized the actions of the so-called 'Čurilla group' regarding members of the organized Takáč gang, concluded that their harsh treatment exceeded legally permissible limits, indicating an inconsistency in the application of the law.

This situation raises concerns about the fairness and objectivity of law enforcement practices in Slovakia, highlighting a potential bias where certain individuals are treated more leniently based on their affiliations. The implications of such findings are significant, as they question the integrity of the justice system and whether it operates on principles of equality before the law, or if some cases are systematically prejudiced based on the individuals involved.