Judge Tomáš Hajduk from the Bratislava I District Court indicated that his inability to approve the detention of former police officers Ján Čurilla and Pavol Ďurka was largely due to the submission of the detention request to an inappropriate court, which he deemed illegal. Prosecutor Michal Žeňuch's proposal for their detention was not only misplaced but also created a scenario where any prosecutor could make such requests arbitrarily at any court, undermining legal protocols.

In his ruling, Judge Hajduk emphasized the importance of adhering to legal protocols and indicated that accepting the prosecutor's interpretation would have dangerous implications for the judiciary and law enforcement, potentially leading to a disregard for established legal frameworks. He cited pertinent legislative provisions to further illustrate his position, reminding the court of its responsibility to maintain order and legality in judicial proceedings.

The ruling has broader implications not just for the current defendants but for the judicial system in Slovakia. It raises questions about the accountability and oversight of prosecutorial decisions and the potential for abuse within the justice system. The reaction from law enforcement and the justice community in Slovakia will be closely monitored, as it could influence future engagements between prosecutors and courts.