Mar 10 • 04:30 UTC 🇪🇸 Spain El País

The end of the neutral ‘influencer’: is it possible to be relevant when you never give your opinion?

The article discusses the challenges faced by content creators who choose to remain neutral in political and social matters, questioning whether they can maintain relevance.

The article examines the current landscape for social media influencers who choose to adopt a neutral stance on political and social issues. It notes that many content creators fear losing partnerships or facing backlash if they express controversial opinions, which leads them to avoid engagement in pressing societal matters. This trend raises questions about their long-term relevance in a media environment that increasingly values opinions and activism.

Recent findings from the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) indicate that a significant portion of the Spanish population believes social media has a profound impact on political opinions and decision-making. Specifically, 30.4% of Spaniards feel that the internet and social media have been the most influential factors in shaping political views over the last two years. This underscores the considerable weight that influencers and content creators hold in shaping public discourse, yet many choose to sidestep this responsibility, which could lead to a decline in their authenticity and trustworthiness.

In a time marked by significant global issues, such as conflicts and the rise of authoritarian governments, the article emphasizes that the silence of influencers on critical topics may have larger implications. It argues that remaining neutral in an increasingly polarized world could mean missing opportunities to effect change or to connect with audiences seeking genuine engagement on important issues. As the role of influencers evolves, they may need to reassess their strategies to remain relevant amidst the growing call for accountability and responsiveness in their platforms.

📡 Similar Coverage