Paulo Gonet, the Attorney General of Brazil, has formally expressed his concerns to Minister André Mendonça of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) regarding the lack of time allocated for analyzing the representations that led to the new arrest of banker Daniel Vorcaro, affiliated with Master. Gonet highlighted that there were no indications or evidence necessitating such rapid judicial action within hours, thereby questioning the urgency imposed on the legal process.

The communications between the Attorney General's office and the STF reveal that three petitions were received, with the first arriving on the previous Saturday and two others on the following Monday. Gonet emphasized the inadequate timeframes imposed on his office to review these extensive documents—each containing more than 700 pages—with the first petition requiring a 72-hour response time while the latter two were trimmed down to just 24 hours. This situation raises concerns over the thoroughness of legal proceedings when under such tight deadlines, particularly in serious cases.

Additionally, Gonet defended the necessity of the Attorney General's input in these legal matters, arguing that any police report alone should not suffice to warrant judicial action without a substantive review. The emphasis on ensuring proper legal process standards and the ramifications of rushed judicial decisions reflect deeper issues within Brazil's legal system, particularly concerning high-profile financial cases such as Vorcaro's. This case is indicative of ongoing tensions between legal procedural integrity and the demands of judicial expediency in the country's judiciary.