This article from Naftemporiki delves into the complex history of the Kurdish forces' relationship with the United States, particularly highlighting moments of betrayal and exploitation as the US supports them as disposable proxy forces. Citing historical events such as the abandonment of Iraqi Kurds in 1975, the article draws parallels to current political dynamics where the US and Israel encourage Kurdish militias to serve against the Iranian government, raising concerns about their safety and future. Experts point out the risks inherent in using the Kurds as a tool for regime change, given the historical precedent of such strategies backfiring in the region.

The article references Mahmoud Alluh, a regional expert, who emphasizes that the current US strategy appears to aim not merely at regime change in Iran but at its dissolution, indicating a significant geopolitical ambition that involves a deeper involvement of Kurdish forces. This multi-faceted approach is seen as fraught with danger, as it relies heavily on Kurdish fighters who have faced abandonment in the past, which may compromise their trust in the US-Supported initiatives. The historical lessons learned from earlier US involvement reveal a pattern where the Kurds have often ended up as collateral damage in broader geopolitical strategies.

With the resurgence of Kurdish forces in both Iraq and Syria acting as frontline warriors with the backing of global powers, the implications of such relationships are manifold. As tensions rise in the region, questions about the sustainability of the Kurds as allies, their autonomy, and the potential for further exploitation loom large. The narratives of betrayal that have characterized the Kurdish experience serve as a cautionary tale for both the Kurds and their current allies as regional dynamics continue to evolve.