The article examines the prevailing sentiment among Iranian Kurds who express deep skepticism about the reliability of U.S. commitments, particularly in the context of recent geopolitical developments. Many Kurdish leaders believe that the historical record of U.S. foreign interventions has not been favorable, leading them to question whether they can trust American promises of support and protection. This mistrust is exacerbated by the complex political realities in the Middle East, where alliances can shift rapidly and past actions have often left regional allies feeling abandoned.

Moreover, the article delves into the broader implications of this skepticism, suggesting that the U.S. might struggle to form alliances with Kurdish groups in Iran if trust cannot be established. The Kurds have historically sought greater autonomy and recognition from the Iranian government, and any hope for support from international actors often hinges on their perception of the reliability of those partners. For many in the Kurdish community, the fear of betrayal by a foreign ally has led to a cautious and pragmatic approach in their political strategy and aspirations.

Ultimately, the article underscores the fragile nature of Kurdish-U.S. relations and suggests that without a change in U.S. policy and a concerted effort to build trust with Kurdish groups, the potential for effective cooperation in addressing shared concerns in the region may remain limited. The dynamics of Kurdish politics, intertwined with broader Middle Eastern conflicts, highlight the necessity for all parties involved to proceed with caution to avoid further disappointments that could complicate future engagements.