In a recent interview with the news portal lrytas.lt, V. Bakas revealed that he had a stressful discussion with S. Skvernelis concerning A. Silickienė roughly ten years ago, which seems to indicate longstanding complexities in their professional relationships. Bakas's comments come amidst ongoing scrutiny surrounding Skvernelis, who has faced legal issues including searches by law enforcement. In response to questions about Silickienė's role, Skvernelis insisted that their relationship was merely professional and maintained that he had no grievances regarding her conduct as an advisor.

Despite Skvernelis's assertions about a strictly business-like connection with Silickienė, the context implies otherwise, considering Bakas's reference to their past discussions. Skvernelis emphasized that he worked with Silickienė for about ten months during her advisory role in the Seimas (Lithuanian Parliament), and mentioned that their relationship is characterized as friendly and collegial. However, the ongoing investigations and public questioning about their ties may suggest deeper implications regarding transparency and accountability within political circles.

Silickienė has echoed Skvernelis's claims about their relationship, stating it is as disclosed, emphasizing her past role as his advisor. As investigations unfold, both figures can expect heightened scrutiny, as their connections may further be analyzed under the lens of legal oversight and public interest, raising concerns about influence and improper conduct in public office. This dynamic underscores the importance of clarity in political relationships, especially in light of potential conflicts of interest.