The Croatian parliamentary discussion regarding Ivana Kekin's presentation at the XVI Gymnasium in Zagreb intensified into a significant political strife. This event followed Kekin's shared photo with students aimed at discussing children's protection in the digital sphere. However, she faced backlash after posting the image of minors, leading to accusations that politicians should refrain from addressing students in schools. To quell the criticism, Kekin subsequently removed the post from her social media platforms.

As part of the unfolding controversy, it was revealed that the removal of the photograph occurred following a request from the school's principal, who clarified that Kekin was invited to speak as a psychiatrist. Defending Kekin, her colleague Sandra Benčić asserted in parliament that members of the ruling HDZ party also engage in school visits. This defense aimed to mitigate the implications of the backlash against Kekin and emphasize the importance of such discussions about digital safety.

The situation illustrates a broader narrative in Croatian politics where educational engagements by politicians are scrutinized, especially when involving young individuals. The altercation in parliament highlights the tensions between political parties, as well as the need for clearer guidelines on how public figures interact with educational institutions and minors. The implications of this debate extend to policies regarding the involvement of politicians in school environments, as societal attitudes toward such interactions evolve.