On January 3, Cho Hee-dae, the Chief Justice of South Korea, reaffirmed his commitment to fulfilling his constitutional duties, declaring that the judiciary must maintain its responsibilities regardless of any pressures for resignation. This statement comes in the wake of the National Assembly's passage of key judicial reforms, collectively referred to as the 'Judicial 3 Laws,' which have sparked significant debate and criticism regarding their implications for the judiciary's independence. Cho's remarks are interpreted as a clear dismissal of any speculation about his potential resignation amidst these challenges.

During an encounter with reporters earlier that day, Cho addressed the National Assembly's legislative actions, acknowledging that while no system is perfect and improvements are necessary, lawmakers should contemplate the potential impacts of abrupt changes on the public. He urged the citizens to critically assess the reforms and reflect on whether they serve the public good or pose risks, indicating his stance that swift transformations should be approached with caution. Furthermore, he emphasized the need for respect toward the legislative process, advocating constructive dialogue over hasty reforms.

While Cho defends the judiciary's credibility against criticisms alleging declining public trust, he referenced various surveys to assert that South Korea's judicial trust levels are comparable to those of other developed nations like the U.S. and Germany. Cho firmly opposed the narrative that demonizes judges or undermines the judiciary without substantial evidence. In contrast, the Democratic Party continued its pressure for his resignation, with prominent party members publicly expressing their dissatisfaction and advising him to reconsider his position, thereby highlighting the ongoing political tensions surrounding judicial reforms and governance in South Korea.