Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide has expressed strong disapproval of the recent military actions taken by the United States and Israel against Iran, arguing that these attacks are not in line with international law. Eide emphasized that for such military interventions to be justified under international law, they must meet specific criteria, particularly that there be an immediate threat necessitating military action.

Eide's comments came in response to Israel's characterization of its strike as a preemptive attack. However, he countered that the situation does not fulfill the necessary conditions for a preemptive strike, which typically requires evidence of an imminent attack on the attacking state. This declaration from the Norwegian foreign minister underscores Norway's commitment to international law and the principles of justifiable military action.

The implications of Eide's statement are significant as they reflect Norway's stance on the tense geopolitical landscape concerning Iran and highlight the ongoing debate about the legality of military strikes in international relations. This situation could further complicate diplomatic relations between involved nations and may call for a reevaluation of international norms surrounding military intervention.