In a statement regarding the recent military actions by the United States and Israel against Iran, Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide expressed significant concerns about the legality of these operations. Eide emphasized that such actions do not align with the principles of international law, specifically pointing out the requirement for an imminent attack to justify preemptive strikes. He stated, "This is not in accordance with international law," indicating that the justification put forth by Israel for their actions does not meet the necessary criteria.

Eide's remarks reflect a broader concern in international discourse regarding the legitimacy of preemptive military actions. Israel characterized its actions as a preventive attack aimed at thwarting a potential threat; however, Eide challenged this characterization by highlighting that, according to international law, a preemptive strike must be based on credible evidence of an immediate danger. His comments signal Norway's commitment to upholding international legal standards and could influence discussions within international forums regarding accountability for such military actions.

The implications of Eide's statement extend beyond the immediate context of the attacks. As tensions in the region escalate, the role of international law in moderating state behavior becomes increasingly critical. Eide's position not only reinforces Norway’s stance on international law but also adds to the calls from various countries for restraint and adherence to legal norms in responding to perceived threats, raising questions about the future of conflict resolution in the Middle East.