Why living next to a superpower can never be neutral
The article discusses the complexities and challenges faced by Central Asian republics in their relations with Russia, likening their situation to that of Mexico's dynamics with the United States.
The piece explores the dynamics between Russia and its southern neighbors, particularly the Central Asian republics, suggesting that these nations face a difficult balancing act in their relationships with Moscow. Critics argue that Russia reaps significant benefits from these smaller states while they contribute little in return. The article proposes that a shift in Russia's approach may be warranted, drawing a parallel to the historically pragmatic and sometimes harsh treatment the U.S. has displayed toward Central America over the years.
Furthermore, the article uses the recent violent unrest in Mexico following the assassination of a major crime figure as an illustrative example of state fragility. The author suggests this unrest reflects a broader issue of state capacity and authority, arguing that Mexican state functionality is compromised to the extent that it struggles to maintain organized violence and control. This comparison emphasizes the potential vulnerabilities faced by the Central Asian states as they navigate their complex relationships with a powerful neighbor.
Ultimately, the analysis underscores that the geopolitical realities around superpowers create an inevitable imbalance and pressure on neighboring states. As these relationships evolve, the dynamics seen in Mexico could serve as cautionary tales for Central Asian countries, which must develop strategies to mitigate their dependence on and risks associated with Russia's dominance in the region.