The court case involving V. Giraitytė-Juškevičienė, a former member of the Marijampolė council, has encountered delays as her lawyer, Renas Bradūnas, cannot attend the scheduled hearings due to his involvement in a separate case regarding riots at the Lithuanian Parliament. This lawyer's absence has created complications, as both the court and the defendant had anticipated his participation at the hearings, scheduled for both an earlier date and April 14. Judge L. Šiukšta expressed concern that Giraitytė-Juškevičienė did not attend the session, interpreting this as her belief that her presence was unnecessary without the lawyer, which raises questions about her commitment to the case.

The court has indicated its intention to continue the hearings on March 10, with plans to hear all witnesses involved in the case. The Judge mentioned that the situation with Giraitytė-Juškevičienė raises issues about whether they might need to appoint a different lawyer if her current representative cannot fulfill his obligations. The judge further emphasized that the lawyer's engagement in another case should not excuse his absence in this matter, suggesting a firm stance on ensuring the case moves forward despite the logistical challenges faced.

This case may have broader implications for the proceedings in the Lithuanian legal system, especially regarding the management of legal representation and courtroom attendance. Giraitytė-Juškevičienė's situation reflects larger issues within public service conduct and accountability, which are critical for navigating public trust in local governance. The outcome of this trial may also influence future policies related to the responsibilities of elected officials and their engagement within the judicial framework.