On Wednesday, Agnė Silickienė, a former advisor to the Lithuanian political leader Saulius Skvernelis, arrived at the Special Investigation Service (STT) to testify regarding potential corruption within the State Plant Protection Service. However, she and her lawyer were initially unable to enter the facility; the lawyer's refusal to deposit the vehicle keys in a designated storage led to a delay in the proceedings. This incident highlights concerns among legal professionals regarding the protocols and treatment of individuals involved in investigations.

The security measures and regulations at the STT have come under scrutiny as Silickienė’s legal representative voiced dissatisfaction over the handling of the situation. The incident has raised questions about the balance between necessary security measures and the rights of individuals in legal proceedings. Many lawyers have reacted strongly, describing the protocols as inappropriate and low, suggesting that such practices could hinder fair legal representation.

Amid ongoing discussions about corruption in Lithuania and the implications for public trust in institutions, this incident serves to emphasize the challenges faced by legal advisors and their clients in navigating the complexities of legal proceedings. The reactions from legal professionals might encourage a reevaluation of existing security policies at such institutions to ensure the protection of rights while still maintaining order and security.