In a recent ruling, the Santa Catarina Court of Justice denied a request from a doctor who has been convicted under Brazil's Maria da Penha Law, aimed at combating domestic violence against women. The convicted individual has received a two-year prison sentence, which is being served in an open regime where he is required to stay under house arrest during specified hours, particularly from Monday to Saturday evenings and throughout Sundays and holidays. He sought to modify these restrictions to allow him to participate in football games on Tuesday nights.

The court emphasized the seriousness of the conviction related to domestic violence and stated that granting such a request could undermine the intent of judicial penalties designed to protect victims. Despite the doctor's claim of needing physical activity for health reasons, supported by a medical certificate suggesting exercises like pilates and aerobic activities, the court maintained that his conviction necessitates adherence to the original terms of his sentence, and relaxation of restrictions could send a troubling message regarding accountability for domestic violence.

This decision highlights judicial efforts to uphold the integrity of laws intended to safeguard victims of domestic violence, reflecting a broader societal stance against such crimes. As discussions surrounding domestic violence laws evolve in Brazil, cases like this reinforce the commitment of the legal system to prioritize protections for victims and ensure that offenders are appropriately restricted in their behaviors.